by Jon Ralston Thu, 05/23/2013 - 16:08
-
“I would encourage you to start now lobbying every elected official,” Sen. Pat Spearman (D-North Las Vegas) said. “… t.co/QXokyfBcyc
12 hours 28 min ago.
-
Follow, etc.... t.co/TDsFfaO1oS
13 hours 27 min ago.
-
@timdahlberg @AP Man, you are old.
13 hours 35 min ago.
-
Good morning from The #WeMatter State.
On this date in 1980, the sale began of 923,266 silver dollars that were mi… t.co/clIrCRMzUF
14 hours 27 min ago.
-
Follow our woman in DC for all of the SOTU/Nevada scoop... t.co/D21Suq6C1P
1 day 4 hours ago.
-
Working title:
The Reid Machine strikes back... t.co/SKrV57UoEF
1 day 4 hours ago.
-
Dunno how I missed this.
A classic. t.co/eOp1te4mG3
1 day 5 hours ago.
-
This is also accurate. t.co/K3QNOmEDtF
1 day 7 hours ago.
-
Nobody tells me anything (good policy!).
Very happy for four great members of Team @TheNVIndy. t.co/qCKKPWdkJ5
1 day 8 hours ago.
-
This is fascinating.
A well-respected lawmaker and some experienced hands are running as a slate to take over the… t.co/FOrlQlJbkh
1 day 9 hours ago.
Legislators want to be able to take gifts from special interests and lobbyists and then hide them, according to an amendment to an already gutted campaign transparency bill.
Yes, you read that right.
The amendment mysteriously is not on the legislative web site, but I have obtained it ( put in by Assembly panel on Friday) and attached the relevant parts here.
The language carves out a section for state lawmakers to allow them to attend events to which all members of the Gang of 63 are invited and accept freebies. That's brazen enough. But they want more: They want to be able to conceal their favors from the public.
That's what the amendment says. That's how shameless they are. (I wonder how other gift-grabbing elected officials feel that state lawmakers want this provision all to themselves. They are special, eh?)
The measure, SB 49, is in the Assembly now after senators dramatically scaled back real-time reporting provisions, altered gift rules and made cash-on-hand as invisible as ever. The legislation from the secretary of state's office still has good provisions -- quarterly off-year reporting, for instance -- but it is a shadow of its original self.
And now this? Upon what meat doth the Gang of 63 feed?
Comments: